<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pincus: Rumors - Laker Blockbuster Unlikely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelakersnation.com/blog/2007/12/28/pincus-rumors-laker-blockbuster-unlikely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelakersnation.com/blog/2007/12/28/pincus-rumors-laker-blockbuster-unlikely/</link>
	<description>The #1 Source For Everything Lakers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: RitchQB</title>
		<link>http://thelakersnation.com/blog/2007/12/28/pincus-rumors-laker-blockbuster-unlikely/#comment-20849</link>
		<dc:creator>RitchQB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelakersnation.com/blog/?p=1854#comment-20849</guid>
		<description>Conventional wisdom would say that the Lakers would be crazy to trade for either J-Kidd or Jermaine, especially given how great the team has been playing.  No way we give up AB now and for what, a past-his-prime point guard and an injury prone 4?  Still, it would be intriguing if the Lakers could pull it off without giving up too much.  I would give up Jordan and Kwame for Jermaine, but no way would I do the same for Kidd.  At least Jermaine would give us another front line guy to go up against the Spurs, Mavs, Jazz, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conventional wisdom would say that the Lakers would be crazy to trade for either J-Kidd or Jermaine, especially given how great the team has been playing.  No way we give up AB now and for what, a past-his-prime point guard and an injury prone 4?  Still, it would be intriguing if the Lakers could pull it off without giving up too much.  I would give up Jordan and Kwame for Jermaine, but no way would I do the same for Kidd.  At least Jermaine would give us another front line guy to go up against the Spurs, Mavs, Jazz, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaq786</title>
		<link>http://thelakersnation.com/blog/2007/12/28/pincus-rumors-laker-blockbuster-unlikely/#comment-20840</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaq786</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelakersnation.com/blog/?p=1854#comment-20840</guid>
		<description>kwame, v.rad, and mihm... are extras for us... we need defense and health


d-fish/farmar/javaris
kobe/sasha/coby
trevor/walton
odom/ronny/noah
bynum/wallace


u guys are makin it seem like i jus suggested trading kobe for ben wallace.... if u dont think its good tell me WHY... not be a internet hard ass... who stay behind you screen talkin smack

PS.GREAT JOB MODS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kwame, v.rad, and mihm&#8230; are extras for us&#8230; we need defense and health</p>
<p>d-fish/farmar/javaris<br />
kobe/sasha/coby<br />
trevor/walton<br />
odom/ronny/noah<br />
bynum/wallace</p>
<p>u guys are makin it seem like i jus suggested trading kobe for ben wallace&#8230;. if u dont think its good tell me WHY&#8230; not be a internet hard ass&#8230; who stay behind you screen talkin smack</p>
<p>PS.GREAT JOB MODS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAKing</title>
		<link>http://thelakersnation.com/blog/2007/12/28/pincus-rumors-laker-blockbuster-unlikely/#comment-20820</link>
		<dc:creator>LAKing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelakersnation.com/blog/?p=1854#comment-20820</guid>
		<description>Who gives a shit? I wouldn't want to trade for him anyways. I don't want to give up any of our young players and disturb our team chemistry. We're better off, most likely, he'll stay with the Nets until he's a free agent next summer and then he'll sign with another team. If he decides to come to the Lakers then, he'll have to take a small paycut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who gives a {Profanity isn't allowed on theLakersNation.com -- Please go back and edit your comment. Thank you.}? I wouldn&#8217;t want to trade for him anyways. I don&#8217;t want to give up any of our young players and disturb our team chemistry. We&#8217;re better off, most likely, he&#8217;ll stay with the Nets until he&#8217;s a free agent next summer and then he&#8217;ll sign with another team. If he decides to come to the Lakers then, he&#8217;ll have to take a small paycut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricky</title>
		<link>http://thelakersnation.com/blog/2007/12/28/pincus-rumors-laker-blockbuster-unlikely/#comment-20818</link>
		<dc:creator>ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelakersnation.com/blog/?p=1854#comment-20818</guid>
		<description>tim,

you actually think zach randolph is a good forward compared to lamar odom? wow, thats a terrible comparison. i understand that offensively he is better, but in other aspects, he cannot even compare to lamar. randolph is slow, a mediocre defender, and a not so smart basketball player. by the way, he has a very bad attitude that wont help team chemistry. lamar is capable of running the offense, a good rebounder, a decent defender, a good passer, and he can do all the intagibles that randolph cannot. 

im sure many others will agree with me on that comparison. odom is better to have than randolph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tim,</p>
<p>you actually think zach randolph is a good forward compared to lamar odom? wow, thats a terrible comparison. i understand that offensively he is better, but in other aspects, he cannot even compare to lamar. randolph is slow, a mediocre defender, and a not so smart basketball player. by the way, he has a very bad attitude that wont help team chemistry. lamar is capable of running the offense, a good rebounder, a decent defender, a good passer, and he can do all the intagibles that randolph cannot. </p>
<p>im sure many others will agree with me on that comparison. odom is better to have than randolph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rpoc</title>
		<link>http://thelakersnation.com/blog/2007/12/28/pincus-rumors-laker-blockbuster-unlikely/#comment-20817</link>
		<dc:creator>Rpoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelakersnation.com/blog/?p=1854#comment-20817</guid>
		<description>Btw, if Noah practices flopping enough he's the next Varejao. Waste of a lottery pick still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, if Noah practices flopping enough he&#8217;s the next Varejao. Waste of a lottery pick still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rpoc</title>
		<link>http://thelakersnation.com/blog/2007/12/28/pincus-rumors-laker-blockbuster-unlikely/#comment-20816</link>
		<dc:creator>Rpoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelakersnation.com/blog/?p=1854#comment-20816</guid>
		<description>[Comment ID #20814 Will Be Quoted Here]
It's ok my fellow trulls fan, just let it all out. Tell us how you really feel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote class='comment_quote'><p><a href="http://thelakersnation.com/blog/2007/12/28/pincus-rumors-laker-blockbuster-unlikely/#comment-20814"  title="Click here to view the original comment"><em>Tim on December 29, 2007 at 12:41 am said:</em></a></p>
<p>Shaq786&#8230;id rather have Kwame, mihm, and V rad than wallace, noah, and a draft pick, id rather get Noah alone</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s ok my fellow trulls fan, just let it all out. Tell us how you really feel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://thelakersnation.com/blog/2007/12/28/pincus-rumors-laker-blockbuster-unlikely/#comment-20814</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelakersnation.com/blog/?p=1854#comment-20814</guid>
		<description>Shaq786...id rather have Kwame, mihm, and V rad than wallace, noah, and a draft pick, id rather get Noah alone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaq786&#8230;id rather have Kwame, mihm, and V rad than wallace, noah, and a draft pick, id rather get Noah alone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoJo</title>
		<link>http://thelakersnation.com/blog/2007/12/28/pincus-rumors-laker-blockbuster-unlikely/#comment-20813</link>
		<dc:creator>JoJo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelakersnation.com/blog/?p=1854#comment-20813</guid>
		<description>Shaq786 your a dumbass! The Lakers will bust in the playoffs. The Bulls would never take your garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaq786 your a dumbass! The Lakers will bust in the playoffs. The Bulls would never take your garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaq786</title>
		<link>http://thelakersnation.com/blog/2007/12/28/pincus-rumors-laker-blockbuster-unlikely/#comment-20810</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaq786</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelakersnation.com/blog/?p=1854#comment-20810</guid>
		<description>kwame, mihm, V.RAD..... for big ben, noah and a pick.... GET IT DONE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kwame, mihm, V.RAD&#8230;.. for big ben, noah and a pick&#8230;. GET IT DONE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drake hunter</title>
		<link>http://thelakersnation.com/blog/2007/12/28/pincus-rumors-laker-blockbuster-unlikely/#comment-20809</link>
		<dc:creator>drake hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelakersnation.com/blog/?p=1854#comment-20809</guid>
		<description>I for one wouldn’t mind getting Kidd, but i would prefer Artest. Everyone thinks Kidd is to old and overrated. that may be true but a few good things Kidd brings to the table
1. If kidd is our starter fisher is our backup which means a full game of veteran pg leadership( having a heady floor general leads to  success in the nba
2. Kidd can help mentor crit for the next two years, imagine crit with all his skills plus the tutoring of kidd and fisher, that my friend will be priceless. so in reality we get Kidd for 2 years and a more developed crit sooner then expected.
3. Another veteran player that can help keep Kobe from exploding and possibly staying with our franchise longer then 2 more years. Look at what fishers presence has done thus far.
4. Defense, we get burned way to much by speedy pg, Kidd may not have a great jumpshot but he’s a definate upgrade in our post game. he can dominate in the post which can really be effective for our team especially bynum who can get a lot of put backs.
5. Lastly he can help us draw more nba vets who might want to contend, after acquiring kidd we still will have a lot of players we can deal…. think about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one wouldn’t mind getting Kidd, but i would prefer Artest. Everyone thinks Kidd is to old and overrated. that may be true but a few good things Kidd brings to the table<br />
1. If kidd is our starter fisher is our backup which means a full game of veteran pg leadership( having a heady floor general leads to  success in the nba<br />
2. Kidd can help mentor crit for the next two years, imagine crit with all his skills plus the tutoring of kidd and fisher, that my friend will be priceless. so in reality we get Kidd for 2 years and a more developed crit sooner then expected.<br />
3. Another veteran player that can help keep Kobe from exploding and possibly staying with our franchise longer then 2 more years. Look at what fishers presence has done thus far.<br />
4. Defense, we get burned way to much by speedy pg, Kidd may not have a great jumpshot but he’s a definate upgrade in our post game. he can dominate in the post which can really be effective for our team especially bynum who can get a lot of put backs.<br />
5. Lastly he can help us draw more nba vets who might want to contend, after acquiring kidd we still will have a lot of players we can deal…. think about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
