Comments on: Lakers among those interested in Barry

By: Billy Kupchak

Billy Kupchak — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:54:41 +0000

i say Barry can BURY himself!

By: iLakers

iLakers — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:06:29 +0000

barry does not consistently make the 3…cmon now.

we don’t need him, he doesn’t know the system, the players we have now know the system, and we’re gellin pretty good right now.

so i say NO.

By: kPoAbUe

kPoAbUe — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:25:25 +0000

i say vlad inst that threat of a 3 point shooter cause when he gets the ball he drives in if we get berry he consistently makes them

By: PhantoM

PhantoM — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:12:35 +0000

If rad injury was very severe, i would say this would be ideal for us
to get him..

other wise only reason to acquire barry is to not let other teams
get him.

By: Tyler

Tyler — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:53:24 +0000

i think it would be a waste of money though because were would he play we have rad for the threes so i think its not smart

By: KB

KB — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:14:15 +0000

we should get him cuz if they dubble bynum or gasol just kick it out 2 him or kobe

By: kobe-wan kenobi

kobe-wan kenobi — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:41:02 +0000

I m ok with that
but we should heavily try to get magloire!!!!!!

By: RD

RD — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:33:53 +0000

do it! i dont see a reason not to! it wont hurt us, what-so-ever.

By: lalakerfan

lalakerfan — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:32:27 +0000

yeah i agree. it’d be more of a defensive move to keep him out of the other teams in the west. if so, do it. won’t hurt to have another shooter coming off the bench

By: Ballin'08

Ballin'08 — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:37:16 +0000

Do it…Barry is more of a presence at the three than Walton…