Comments on: Artest hopes for trade from Kings, will act as own agent

By: lskerfan567

lskerfan567 — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 05:20:04 +0000

I LOVE TO HATE ON ARTEST JK
WE ALREADY HAVE RON RON2, BUT WIT OUT THE CRAZY

TREVOR ARIZA PPLZ, LOOK HIM UP ON YOUTUBE IF YOUR A BANDWAGON LAKER FAN

By: DCLAKER

DCLAKER — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 05:14:21 +0000

It keeps things interesting is what I’m sayin’.

By: lakersforlife77

lakersforlife77 — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 05:12:00 +0000

Can somebody say “sweet”. The Artest haters have to be nervous now.

By: lakers4life

lakers4life — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 05:07:43 +0000

[Comment ID #45176 Will Be Quoted Here]

oh my bad didnt see the , but what you mean i love your comments?

By: LakersFirst

LakersFirst — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:57:47 +0000

[Comment ID #45202 Will Be Quoted Here]

As much as I like Arest, Odom and Mihm for Marion is more realistic and an easier trade. Marion, I believe, will make $17M which is an expiring contract that is appealing to the Lakers. Not to menion Marion is very good defender and I would say a better slasher than LO. Odom ($14M next year) and Mihm ($2.6M), both have expiring contracts, would appeal to Miami. Pat Riley has always like LO and before his ankle injury, Mihm was a decent center (i.e. he wasn’t terrible).

By: Sako

Sako — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:32:25 +0000

[Comment ID #45201 Will Be Quoted Here]

RealGM also said the Lakers are interested

By: Rpoc

Rpoc — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:30:24 +0000

[Comment ID #45193 Will Be Quoted Here]
Bleacher report? What the hell is that?

By: Ko8e_f@n

Ko8e_f@n — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:24:26 +0000

[Comment ID #45193 Will Be Quoted Here]

That’s the best possible move we can make this off-season!

By: Stealthman

Stealthman — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:23:23 +0000

Again no trade goes through without Odom! C’mon do you honestly believe a rival team would give up a good player for garbage???

I do not look at this ridiculous trade like that though! I am looking at it from a money standpoint and the playersteam roster! I feel Lamar needs to be included in a deal for Artest because
1.) He is to expensive to be a bench player! 14 million for a guy comin off the bench?? Get real! That doesnt even make sense!
2.) Our roster would be bloated with small forwards! Why have Ariza if he doesn’t get a chance to play?
3.) (and finally) The most obvious reason is he is our biggest trade piece and to get anything of value in return he has to be included. Period. We just stole Pau! No way in hell any GM let’s the Lakers steal another player!

By: gugy

gugy — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:18:56 +0000

Mihn a solid center?