ESPN: Lakers Ranked 3rd in Top Trios

Personally, the Lakers should be ahead of the Spurs. The way the Lakers dismantled them should rank us ahead of them. Nevertheless, sound-off.

ESPN: 3. Los Angeles Lakers: Kobe | Bynum | Gasol
If Bynum returns quickly to the form he displayed (17.6 ppg, 10.6 rpg, 2.1 bpg) in the three weeks preceding his injury, this will be the league’s second-best trio, at least. And a fourth option like Lamar Odom only strengthens the Lakers’ version of the Big Three.

Related Posts  -
Lakers ranked #7 in NBA.com’s power ranking, Bynum #1 in PER!
ESPN reports 4th team is Boston - Trade details from ESPN News
ESPN: Pacers want deal with Lakers
ESPN Insider says Odom rumors are “bogus”
ESPN predicts Lakers to win NBA championship next year

13 Responses to “ESPN: Lakers Ranked 3rd in Top Trios”


  1. Gravatar Icon 1 Airric23

    1st. We definitely should be ranked higher than San Antonio without a doubt. We will have the best trio when it is all said and done next season.

  2. Gravatar Icon 2 lskerfan567

    that be 3 if lamar odom was there instaed of bynum, ok we 3, if bynum iz there, we way better then spurs

  3. Gravatar Icon 3 SILO

    not bad for a trio that has NEVER played together.

  4. Gravatar Icon 4 kb24bestever

    we should be ranked number forget that its bynum and gasol we got the best on the planet black mamba if his in the trio then it should be really scary so i dont kno why were not ranked 1st.

  5. Gravatar Icon 5 BringDFishBack

    Ok, it’s not that hard to understand. The Lakers trio is not better than the Spurs. The Lakers TEAM is better than the Spurs TEAM. The Spurs trio is much better than the Lakers though. They have been able to accomplish so much with a terrible supporting cast. The Lakers trio has an amazing supporting cast.

  6. Gravatar Icon 6 yellowpurplefever

    ESPN hates Kobe and the Lakers except for Stein. Bias ahole! We should 1 or 2 not 3. Freaking ESPN, I dont watch them as much anymore.

  7. Gravatar Icon 7 NATH

    WTF? Who ranked this? Stupid. Lakers is the best

  8. Gravatar Icon 8 Phant0M


    Who cares how were ranked..
    I’d rather be low actually

  9. Gravatar Icon 9 MR. JUAN_YOUR WARLOCK

    This is just a flea-flying-opinion from some small time poster named Chris Broussard…. Who cares what this fool has to say anyway. …Nobody!, and I mean NOBODY!, will have nor presently have the skill level, length, power and domination as the trio(KB,AB,PG) that still has yet to SHOWCASE their blended and meshed-together talents to the world…. NOT EVEN PP, KG, & RA.

  10. Gravatar Icon 10 Jamie Spears Insider

    We have the BEST BIG FOUR! Odom, Kobe, Bynum, Gasol~!

  11. Gravatar Icon 11 cg75

    i have to agree with being 3rd in that list. 1 & 2 have won championships together. Our big three is yet to play together. We have no idea if it will work or not.

  12. Gravatar Icon 12 xxv112002

    cg75 on August 1, 2008 at 6:44 am said:

    i have to agree with being 3rd in that list. 1 & 2 have won championships together. Our big three is yet to play together. We have no idea if it will work or not.

    True, the reason 1 & 2 were ranked 1 & 2 is because they both won Championships. While #3 has gotten to the Finals. Lakers beat the Spurs this past year is because Spurs were old. The team was playing injured etc. When healthy, the Spurs could’ve gave us at least a scare. But they still deserve to be ranked at least #2 because their big 3 won Championships. You can hate it, you can deny it, but you can’t erase history. I’m not being biased, not being a hater, I’m a Laker fan. I’m just being realistic.

    But hopefully this coming year, we finally win a trophy and be considered #1. GO LAKERS!!!

  13. Gravatar Icon 13 vida8

    what this tool knows anyways….
    wherent they one who ranked lakers 8 last season….
    so SHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.


Go Home

Leave a Reply